Build · 2025-07-19
Designing a free-piston Stirling engine
Can a free-piston Stirling engine be built with a planar spring for the displacer and a helium gas spring instead of a weight on the power piston?
Design stage. The approach: planar spring for the displacer tuned to 5 Hz, a graphite-glass AIRPEL cylinder as the power piston with one port sealed as a gas spring, helium charge, and a direct-drive linear alternator. Target ~30 W. Trial pending.
- Kind
- Build
- Status
- Testing
- Date
- 2025-07-19
- Heating chamber
- 12 in long × 6 in dia.
- Displacer
- Hollow aluminum, 1 mm wall, 8–10.5 in
- Displacer mass
- ~0.4 kg (est.)
- Displacer suspension
- Planar spring, mounted from top
- Target frequency
- 5 Hz
- Spring rate
- k = (2πf)²m ≈ 394 N/m (2.2 lb/in)
- Power piston
- AIRPEL M24D25.0D, 24 mm bore × 25 mm stroke
- Working gas
- Helium, ~30 psi
- Alternator
- Linear, direct drive, no flywheel
- Heat source
- Propane / butane burner
- Output target
- ~30 W
Video
What it is
Return to the free-piston engine after two years of thermoacoustic work. The goal is a sealed, helium-charged engine that sits vertically on a propane or butane burner and generates electricity with nothing to adjust.
Results
None yet.
Lab notes
Why a gas spring
Most hobby Stirlings load the power piston with a weight or mechanical spring. Weight degrades performance. Pressurizing the space above the piston gives a spring that compresses as the piston rises and returns it, with nothing to wear out; the engine becomes a gas spring on both sides of the piston in a sealed vessel.
Why helium
Helium's low molecular mass and high thermal conductivity let the working gas heat and cool faster, which is why high-performance Stirlings use it.
Why vertical
The planar spring works horizontally but carries side-loading; vertical mounting lets gravity assist the displacer and removes that load.
Why a burner, not a campfire
Fire restrictions often rule out campfires; a propane torch or butane stove is available almost anywhere, so the engine is designed around it.
Cost targets
Copper-coil cooling instead of a water jacket (jackets were expensive and prone to leaks). Displacer quoted at ~$130 machined; ceramic would be ~$500, heavier and brittle.
Design log · Jul 26, 2025
Snapshot posted to the channel community tab mid-design; expected to change.
- Spring sizing: for a ~0.4 kg displacer at 5 Hz, k = (2π·5)² × 0.4 ≈ 394 N/m. The spring sets the displacer's natural frequency, which has to match the engine's thermodynamic cycle.
- Power piston: AIRPEL M24D25.0D (double-acting, 24 mm bore, 25 mm stroke). One port sealed so the trapped air acts as an internal gas spring; the other port at the base runs vertically straight into the engine dome.
- Dome cap: hemispherical, chosen for airflow and mechanical fit.
- Plumbing: minimize T-junctions (flow losses); don't feed two pistons symmetrically unless they're isolated. Two piston layouts considered, the single high-efficiency piston favored.
- Alternator: must be matched to piston mass and stroke to convert motion efficiently.
- Feasibility for ~30 W: tight sealing, a high temperature gradient, low dead volume, minimal friction, and accurate spring-to-piston alignment.
Notes transcribed from the build video.
Related
Questions about this one? Ask in the Discord. It's the fastest way to reach me.